Commercial solar payback period
Two proposals for a similar system can quote very different payback periods. The gap is almost always in the assumptions, not the hardware.
What payback period actually measures
Simple payback is capital cost divided by annual saving — how many years until the system has paid for itself, before accounting for financing cost, degradation, or the time value of money. It's a useful first filter, not a full financial case.
What moves the number the most
- Self-consumption assumption. A kWh you use yourself is worth roughly your import rate; a kWh you export is usually worth much less. A proposal assuming 80% self-consumption will show a shorter payback than one assuming 50% — check which is realistic for your actual operating hours and load profile.
- Which electricity rate is used. Valuing every generated kWh at your full all-in import rate (including standing charges and network costs that don't scale with consumption) can overstate savings. See our proposal review for how we flag this.
- What's included in the capital cost. A payback calculated on a price that excludes scaffolding, DNO fees or roof repairs will look better than one that includes them — until those costs turn up separately.
- Degradation and maintenance. A payback figure that ignores gradual output decline and ongoing O&M cost is optimistic by construction.
A better question than "what's the payback?"
Ask each installer to show the assumptions behind their number — self-consumption %, which tariff components are included, and whether O&M is netted off. Two proposals with the same headline payback can be built on very different assumptions, and the more conservative one is often the more trustworthy one.
Want a rough first estimate? Try the calculator. Already have proposals quoting a payback period? Get them independently reviewed.